Agile Application Development: Romilly Cocking's Review

This blog has moved

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:53:00 +0000

This blog is now located at http://romillycocking.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds or you may click here.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://romillycocking.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.

Host your own Windows7 launch party?

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:19:00 +0000

At a loose end? Why not host your own Windows7 launch party? Here's how.

Thanks to Neil Hume of FT Alphaville for this.

What shall we do with Gordon Brown?

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:17:00 +0000

Moonwalker Buzz Aldrin says a global leader should commit to sending a man to Mars.

Go for it, President Obama. And may I suggest Gordon Brown as the lucky spacefarer?

IBM says world will drown in data next year

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:05:00 +0000

According to IBM, "Experts predict that by 2010, the amount of digital information will double every 11 hours."

That's really, really scary. If the amount of data were to double every 11 hours, it would quadruple every day. Over a month the quantity of data would increase by a factor of 36,893,488,147,419,103,232 (roughly speaking). Over a year it would increase by a factor of ...

No, I'm not going to work it out. But if anyone from IBM reads this please can you buy a calculator for the marketing department.

Element 112 needs a name

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:03:00 +0000

A German team is looking for a name for an element that's just about to join the periodic table.

Element 112 is super-heavy and very unstable. It falls apart in milliSeconds.

Gordonium?

Oh, the Coder and the Tester can be Friends, can be Friends...

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:34:00 +0000

(with apologies to Oklahoma!)

Elisabeth Hendrickson just tweeted about a thought-provoking analysis by Michael Bolton of the much-vaunted Continuous Deployment at IMVU.

I'm a big fan of TDD, Automated Tests and Continuous Integration, but I'd hate to develop without help from good Testers. A couple of years ago I worked on a dream project; a very small, highly skilled team which included a couple of developers, a tester and a business analyst. We were pair-programming, and my pairs came from a pool that included some of the best agile developers in the UK. The Tester and Business Analyst were also outstanding.

Our defect rate was very low: five defects in UAT, none in production over a twelve-month period. There's no doubt that this was a team effort; the Tester and the BA both caught many defects that were caused by problems we developers hadn't though of, and therefore never tested for. Equally, the developers tested so thoroughly that the Tester and BA could focus on the hard stuff, where their skills contributed maximum value.

For reasons that need not concern us, the application initially went into production on a machine that was controlled by the developers. We could have done continuous deployment, but we didn't. We always asked our Tester to do a final check-through on our staging box; mostly he found nothing, but once or twice he found defects that would have been real embarrasments in production. Of course, that wasn't his only contribution; our acceptance tests were the product of very close collaboration by the whole team.

So it was no surprise to read to read about Michael Bolton's experience when he did some manual testing of the IMVU site. IMVU practise Continuous Deployment, and claim to rely entirely on Automated Tests. Read Bolton's 50 Deployments A Day and The Perpetual Beta and see the consequences.

EtherPad - real-time collaborative text editing

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:30:00 +0000

A tweet from Eric Mack just pointed me at EtherPad.

It's a free tool for real-time collaborative text editing. As Eric says, it's simple, and it just works.

If two or more of you need to collaborate over the web in real-time on a text document, this is all you need.

Refactoring is much easier...

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:38:00 +0000

Refactoring is much easier when you have clearly expressed intent.

This came up a few days ago when I was talking with Steve and Nat.

We were holding a lunchtime retrospective about the latest delivery of our TDD course.

We talked about what had worked well, what we could do differently, and how we could customise the course for audiences with differing requirements.

Nat and Steve were keen to develop an exercise that would focus on refactoring. I liked the idea but I also wanted to keep an existing exercise which brings to life the value of intentional programming.

I felt that the ability to express intent was even more fundamental than the skill of refactoring.

It's risky to refactor unless you can check whether the code still does what is wanted. I don't think you can do that easily unless the tests and code express intention.

Nat reminded me that what you express, and how you express it, is different in code and tests. Good tests remind you of intent when they fail. This makes it easier to diagnose the cause of failure.

Refactoring is easiest with clean code, and clean code expresses clear intent. (Of course, as Steve pointed out, everything is easier if you have clean code).

You might refactor because the intent is not clear, but there are other reasons to do so. For example, you might refactor in order to make the code easier to change.

"The ability to pay back debt...depends on you writing code that is clean enough to be able to refactor as you come to understand your problem"

Ward Cunningham - Debt

Conclusion: we will develop a module on refactoring, but we'll keep our emphasis on writing clean code and tests that clearly express intent.

GetInLine version 2

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:07:00 +0000

I'm currently working on GetInLine 2 - a complete rewrite of GetInLine, a record-processing DSL I wrote a couple of years ago.

The DSL is not yet as fluent as I would like, but I'm much happier with the underlying design. I'll also be switching to an Apache license; James Strachan encouraged me to do this for version 1, but I never got round to it.

I'm following the development approach that Steve Freeman and Nat Pryce advocate in their book (and which the three of us expound in our TDD course).

I started with a failing end-to-end test. Then I used mocks and unit tests to help me to pull the required interfaces into existence, filling out the application until the first end-to-end test passed.

The resulting code is much simpler to test and write than v1 was, and I've ended up with a highly pluggable set of components.

I'll post a URL as soon as GIL2 is ready for beta testing; if anyone wants to tale a look before then, let me know.

Opportunism knocks

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:41:00 +0000

I've just angrily binned an invitation from the Professional Conractors' Guild.

I'm a PCG member, and I've been very happy with them. If you, like me, work as an IT contractor in the UK you'll find they offer an excellent and valuable range of services. I routinely recommend them to colleagues. So -what did they do to annoy me?

They invited me to their tenth birthday celebration.

For which I would have had to don a DJ and pay them £60.

Why on earth would they think I'd want to do that?

I'm glad they have been going for a while, but not glad enough to fork out £60. Even worse, I'd have to spend the evening talking to other IT contractors - and we'd all be wearing dinner jackets.

If the economy had been booming I'd just have tossed the invitation in the bin, but with things as they are the invitation was about as welcome as an invitation to play a round of golf with Fred the Shred. (I assume he plays golf, on the grounds that he must be good at something.)

So, PCG: I won't be joining in your narcissistic celebration, and please don't waste my membership fees on promoting events like this in future.

Read "Rocks into Gold" and spread the word!

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 14:15:00 +0000

I've just read Clarke Ching's Rock's into Gold on SlideShare. It's a delightful short story which explains how incremental delivery can improve cash flow, saving jobs in the process.

I first met Clarke at XP Day a couple of years ago. Several friends told me how much they liked his Introduction to Agile Development, so I went along. I'm glad I did.

Clarke's presentation was excellent - clear, simple, business focussed, and very compelling. So's Rocks Into Gold. I've started to use it as a resource for prospective agile adopters; I may even save a few jobs!

Read it and spread the word.

How do new ideas spread?

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:38:00 +0000

I've recently been studying how we change the way that we develop software. This links in with the broader question of how innovations spread. The best-known book on this is Geoffrey Moore's Crossing the Chasm, which explores the obstacles faced by high-tech innovation.

Crossing the Chasm is an influential and readable book, generous in its acknowledgements and full of good stories, but it has no bibliography. For sixteen years I've been looking for the book that introduced the technology life cycle. Moore refers to it but never names it.

I think I've found it in Diffusion of Innovations, by Everett M. Rogers. It's now in its fifth edition. Its examples are extensive and compelling, and it has an extensive bibliography. Best of all, it includes a checklist of the key attributes of innovations. Rogers calls them

Relative advantage
Compatibility
Complexity
Trialability and
Observability

These perceptions largely determine the rate at which we adopt an innovation, so anyone in the business of change needs to study them carefully.

Diffusion of Innovations is a scholarly work, and needs more time to read than Crossing the Chasm. For me that time has been well-spent.

SPA2009 open for session proposals

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:47:00 +0000

SPA2009 is now accepting session proposals, and some have already arrived.

If you would like to present at this unique conference you'll find the call for proposals on the SPA2009 website.

If you want to attend the conference, consider proposing a session. As a session leader, you will

have fun
polish your communication skills
improve your profile in the industry
and get a substantial discount!

You'll be helped by a supportive shepherding process. SPA shepherds are experienced presenters and many of them have coming to the conference for years. The shepherds can help you develop a successful session that takes full advantage of SPA's interactive format.

The deadline for submissions is 6pm on Monday 15th September 2008.

miniSPA2008 and cfp for Spa2009

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:11:00 +0000

I spent yesterday at miniSPA2008. MiniSPA is the free one-day taster for the annual Software Practice Advancement conference. Lots of new faces yesterday, as well as old friends. It looks as if we'll get lots of new session leaders for next year's conference, which is great.

Session leaders get a significant discount; for the next conference, one of them will pay nothing! Details on the SPA2009 "lead a session" page.

If you're new to leading conference sessions, a supportive shepherding process will help you to hone your skills. Quite a few big names on the conference circuit cut their teeth at SPA.

Whether you're an expert in the making or a hardened veteran, make sure you get your proposal in soon. Submissions open on Monday, and the deadline for submissions is 6pm on 15th September 2008.

TiddlyWiki to MindMap converter

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:50:00 +0000

Knowledge is my stock in trade, and I use TiddlyWiki and Mind Mapping a lot.

Like all Wikis, TiddlyWiki is a great tool for capturing ideas and facts in text and linking them to other relevant topics. It's not so good at showing you the big picture.

Mind Maps (tm) are a great way of presenting the big picture, but programs like FreeMind and MindManager (tm) only show the notes for a single branch at a time.

What if you think of each tool as giving a different view on the same data? Then you could get the best of both worlds.

There's already a hypergraph extension for TiddlyWiki which allows you to see a visual representation of wiki contents but I prefer a more conventional Mind Map that I can edit.

I'm currently experimenting with a simple Python script which converts a TiddlyWiki into a FreeMind Mind Map. The converter works well for small wikis and I'm currently researching how best to structure larger maps.

The converter isn't ready for prime time yet, and documentation is minimal, but it's evolving fast. If you're interested please drop me a note ( at romilly dot cocking at gmail dot com) and I'll send you a copy.

History meme

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:26:00 +0000

Mom, Tim made me do it...

romilly@samba:~$ history | awk
'{a[$2]++}END{for(i in a){print a[i] " " i}}'
| sort -rn | head
106 ls
96 sudo
52 cd
22 nano
16 man
16 find
16 exit
13 chmod
12 cat
10 scp

and, on the Virtual server that hosts samba,

romilly@pc031:~$  history | awk
'{a[$2]++}END{for(i in a){print a[i] " " i}}'
 | sort -rn | head
111 ls
78 cd
76 sudo
32 exit
23 top
21 ping
18 df
13 du
11 scp
11 man

Layers considered harmful: design to interfaces

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:52:00 +0000

Mark Dalgarno recently published an excellent summary of a session presented by Steve Love at ACCU.

The talk offers a critique of the traditional doctrine that architectures should be layered. Instead, Love proposes a style based on designing to interfaces. That's music to my ears: it's exactly the approach we take in our new TDD with jMock2 course.

Love's presentation is available as a pdf. The first half consists of visuals alone; the second half combines the same visuals with notes.

Testing Hibernate-based Persistent objects without Spring

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:30:00 +0000

Nat Pryce just pointed me at an excellent article on Testing Persistent Objects Without Spring by James Richardson.

It shows both the integration test and the code under test.

Lots of good ideas/good practice.

Testing RIAs with WebDriver

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:19:00 +0000

If you need to test Rich Internet Applications from Java, take a look at Webdriver.

Things I like about it:

It uses real browsers to run the tests, quirks and all
It's got a literate testing interface based on Hamcrest and inspired by LiFT.

Here's a very simple example.It's doing simple tests on a static html site:

public class HomePageTest extends HamcrestWebDriverTestCase {
   
   @Override
   protected WebDriver createDriver() {
      return new HtmlUnitDriver();
   }
   
   public void testHomePageHasTitleAndHeading()
         throws Exception {
      goTo("http://test.intranet");
      assertPresenceOf(title()
        .with(text(startsWith("Agile"))));
      assertPresenceOf(title()
        .with(text(containsString("Cocking and Co."))));
      assertPresenceOf(heading(1)
        .with(text(equalTo("Agile Application Development"))));
   }
}

This won't quite work out of the box, as there is no heading finder, but adding one is easy:

public class HeadingFinder extends HtmlTagFinder {
  private final int level;

  public HeadingFinder(int level) {
     this.level = level;
  }

  @Override
  protected String tagDescription() {
     return "heading level "+level;
  }

  @Override
  protected String tagName() {
     return "h"+level;
  }

  public static HeadingFinder heading(int level) {
     return new HeadingFinder(level);
  }
}

It's fairly new, but there are now pre-built binaries available.

Category Theory/Haskell learning group in London

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:00:00 +0000

Peter Marks organised a BOF (Birds of a feather) session on Category Theory at Spa2008. To my surprise about twelve of us turned up. We discovered a shared intuition (bizarre though it seems) that Category Theory will somehow shape the next big thing in application development. Less surprisingly, we also discovered a common enthusiasm for Haskell.

We want to build on this. Most of us are based in London, or can reach it easily. We plan to meet regularly (about once a month) to explore these ideas and to help each other to learn.

I'll post more about this as soon as we have a date and location for our first meeting.

Spa2008 retrospectve

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:56:00 +0000

I'm back from Spa2008, and my head is buzzing.

I felt this was the best Spa conference in recent years. As chairman I'm biased, but I'm not responsible for the quality. That's down to the programme chairs (Eoin Woods and Ivan Moore) and to Andy Moorley who organised things perfectly.

I went to (and really enjoyed):

Mirror, Mirror on the wall - why me? Chris Cooper-Bland and Portia Tung
Thou Shalt Integrate by the Sweat of Thy Brow... Robert James and Eoin Woods
The Need for Speed Paul Dyson and John Nolan
Awesome Acceptance Testing Dan North and Joe Walnes
Spanish Guitar Recital David Harvey
Is Software Practice Advancing? John Daniels and friends
A few things I learned in 50 years of programming L Peter Deutsch
Big Ball of Money, Big Ball of Mud: Economics and Legacy Code Michael Feathers
Closing the Knowing Doing Gap Allan Kelly and Lise Hvatum

Now it's time to start thinking about Spa2009!

Fewer, better people

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:36:00 +0000

I've just read Martin Fowler's post about the Cheaper Talent Hypothesis. It's an issue that most of us have encountered.

If you're in IT, feel underpaid, and think that you're above average (as > 50% of us do), you'll have wondered why you aren't rewarded in keeping with your worth.

I suspect the main reason that good developers are undervalued is that most people think that software is easy to write. Since many IT projects fail, the implication is that we can't very good at what we do.

The conclusion is false because the premise is false. Writing good software is one of the hardest things that people do. I'd love to find some way to allow non-developers to find that out for themselves.

IBM used to run introductory programming courses which included a session called keep the alien alive. The instructor played a dumb alien who obeyed spoken instructions literally; the class had to tell him/her how to drink a glass of water. It was surprisingly hard to do, and the instructor usually got soaked. But it really brought home the fact that programming is hard.

How could we update this for the 21st century?

Jython lives!

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:23:00 +0000

It's good to see that Jython is under active development again.

I use cPython a lot. I'd pretty much stopped using Jython because it does not currently support language features that I find essential - decimals, generators and list comprehensions, for example.

The project seemed to be dormant, but Jython 2.2 has just been released, and it looks like Jython 2.5 is on the way, with all the critical features that I need. Excellent news!

Download all pdfs in a web page

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:32:00 +0000

A while ago I found an out-of-print book with a web-page that listed a series of downloadable pdfs.

Since there were 17 chapters and several other sections, I didn't want to right-click my way through the list so I wrote a quick Python script to do it for me.

This must be a Python idiom. I've had to re-invent it so often, I thought I'd blog it so that I -and you - will never have to create it from scratch again.

Here it is.

import urllib, re, sys
# download each pdf linked to in a web-page.
# assumes that the urls are all relative,
# which is usually the case
pdflink = re.compile(r'<a href="(.*\.pdf)">')
baseURL = sys.argv[1]
page = urllib.urlopen(baseURL+"contents.html")

for line in page.readlines():
  match = pdflink.search(line)
  if match:
      filename = match.group(1)
      print "downloading %s" % filename
      urllib.urlretrieve(baseURL+filename, filename)

Google soft-launches social bookmarking tool

noreply@blogger.com (Romilly) — Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000

Is Google shared stuff the latest hot thing? It's a new social bookmarking tool.

It's available now, although you won't yet find it in the list of Google services and tools, nor on the Google labs page.

As well as sharing with your friends, the new bookmarklet allows you to share your links via several third-party sites, including Facebook, digg, reddit and del.icio.us.

In itself, it wouldn't be worldshaking; but

It's from Google
There are rumors of a soon-to-be-released Google api for social networking.